Daniel A. Fink - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          of account constitute valid verification that the requirements of           
          any applicable law or administrative procedure have been met, see           
          Roberts v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 365, 371-372 n.10 (2002), as              
          does Form 4340, Craig v. Commissioner, supra at 262.  Petitioner            
          has not shown any irregularity in respondent’s assessment proce-            
          dure that would raise a question about the validity of the                  
          assessment or the information contained in the transcripts of               
          account or Form 4340 with respect to petitioner’s taxable year              
          1998.  We hold that the assessment with respect to petitioner’s             
          taxable year 1998 was valid and that the Appeals officer satis-             
          fied the verification requirement of section 6330(c)(1).  See               
          id.; Roberts v. Commissioner, supra.2                                       
               Based upon our examination of the entire record before us,             
          we find that respondent did not abuse respondent’s discretion in            
          determining to proceed with the collection action as determined             
          in the notice of determination with respect to petitioner’s                 
          taxable year 1998.                                                          


               2We shall not specifically address any additional matters,             
          such as the following, which petitioner asserts in petitioner’s             
          response, all of which, as indicated above, the Court finds to be           
          frivolous and/or groundless:                                                
                    d.   Since all valid assessments must emanate from                
               a filed return, proof that such a “filed return” exists                
               is another “relevant” issue that taxpayers can raise.                  
               If this issue is raised, then, obviously, it is incum-                 
               bent upon the appeals officer to produce the return                    
               from which the claimed assessment was made - if this                   
               “relevant” issue is raised by the taxpayer - especially                
               if it was raised on his request for a CDP hearing.                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011