- 9 - In the same memorandum, District Counsel further requested: "Please obtain a copy of the transcript of the allocution hearing. * * * The transcript is a matter of public record; it is not grand jury material."2 Respondent thereafter drafted the statutory notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for their taxable year 1986, using the figures as corrected to match those in exhibit 3. In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that, for 1986, petitioners had failed to report capital gains totaling $5,084,483. Respondent accordingly determined a deficiency of $998,754 in petitioners' Federal income tax for their taxable year ended December 31, 1986, plus an addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b)(1)(A) of $749,066 and a time-sensitive penalty for fraud under section 6653(b)(1)(B). On January 29, 2001, respondent obtained an order, pursuant to rule 6(e)(3)(C)(i), from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The order grants respondent access to grand jury information from petitioner's criminal proceeding for purposes of the instant case. Proceedings Before This Court During the course of substantial pretrial activities before this Court, respondent, on February 8, 2002, served upon 2Although the evidence in the present proceedings contains the transcript of proceedings in the Fatico hearing, it includes few, if any, of the exhibits introduced during that hearing.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011