Robert Henderson - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          concession by respondent,2 the issue for decision is whether a              
          $5,000 payment that Robert Henderson (Mr. Henderson) received in            
          1999 in settlement of a claim against Morgan, Stanley, Dean                 
          Witter & Co. (Morgan Stanley) is excludable from petitioner’s               
          gross income under section 104(a)(2).  We hold that it is not.              
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time he filed the                 
          petition, Mr. Henderson resided in Ojai, California.                        
          A.   Petitioner’s Motel Dispute                                             
               For a period of time during 1997, Mr. Henderson stayed at a            
          motel in Monterey, California.  To pay for his accommodations,              
          Mr. Henderson used a credit card called Prime Option issued by              
          Morgan Stanley.  Following a dispute with the motel owner, Mr.              
          Henderson paid the credit card account balance and canceled the             
          credit card.                                                                
               Approximately 10 weeks later in February 1998, the motel               
          charged Mr. Henderson $780.  Morgan Stanley accepted and paid the           
          $780 charge to Mr. Henderson’s account.  Morgan Stanley then                
          attempted collection from Mr. Henderson.  When Mr. Henderson                



               2 Respondent concedes that petitioner is not liable for                
          self-employment tax of $706 under sec. 1402(a), reducing                    
          petitioner’s deficiency to $336.                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011