- 6 - not be treated as a physical injury or physical sickness” for purposes of section 104(a)(2) (except for damages not in excess of the amount paid for medical care attributable to emotional distress). Prasil v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-100. According to the legislative history of section 104(a)(2), “the term emotional distress includes symptoms (e.g., insomnia, headaches, stomach disorders) which may result from such emotional distress.” H. Conf. Rept. 104-737, at 301 n.56 (1996), 1996-3 C.B. 741, 1041 n.56. Generally, damages are excludable from gross income if they satisfy two requirements. The Supreme Court in Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323, 336 (1995), established those requirements as: First, the taxpayer must demonstrate that the underlying cause of action giving rise to the recovery is ‘based upon tort or tort type rights’; and second, the taxpayer must show that the damages were received ‘on account of personal injuries or sickness.’ * * * The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the court to which this case is appealable, held prior to the amendment of section 104(a)(2) that defamation may be considered a personal injury for purposes of section 104(a)(2). Roemer v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d 693 (9th Cir. 1983), revg. 79 T.C. 398 (1982). However, the amendment to section 104(a)(2), which does not otherwise change the section 104(a)(2) analysis set forth in Schleier, now requires that the payments be “on account ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011