- 9 - evidence. Rule 143(b); Davis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997- 80. Even assuming arguendo that petitioner suffered from a personal physical injury or physical sickness, the record does not support the conclusion that petitioner received the $5,000 settlement payment on account of such physical injury or physical sickness. According to the settlement agreement, petitioner released “any and all claims” against Morgan Stanley in exchange for $5,000. The settlement agreement, however, did not specifically carve out any portion of the settlement payment as a settlement on account of personal physical injury or physical sickness, let alone make reference to a physical injury or a physical sickness resulting from any reputation damage by Morgan Stanley. The settlement agreement did not allocate any part of the settlement payment on account of a personal physical injury or physical sickness. Furthermore, the evidence in the record does not support such an allocation. Accordingly, we conclude that no portion of the $5,000 settlement payment was compensation for a personal physical injury or physical sickness. Therefore, we sustain respondent’s determination in this regard. We have considered all of the other arguments made by the parties and, to the extent that we have not specifically addressed them, we conclude they are without merit.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011