Albert Horton and Ramona Osborne - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          section 66731 (respondent’s motion).2  We shall grant respon-               
          dent’s motion.                                                              
                                    Background                                        
               The record establishes and/or the parties do not dispute the           
          following.                                                                  
               Petitioners resided in Las Vegas, Nevada, at the time they             
          filed the petition in this case.                                            
               On or about April 13, 1998, petitioners jointly filed a                
          Federal income tax (tax) return for their taxable year 1997 (1997           
          joint return).  In their 1997 joint return, petitioners reported            
          total income of $81,895, total tax of $11,677, and tax due of               
          $3,478.  When petitioners filed their 1997 joint return, they did           
          not pay the tax due shown in that return.                                   
               On or about April 13, 1999, petitioners jointly filed a tax            
          return for their taxable year 1998 (1998 joint return).  In their           
          1998 joint return, petitioners reported total income of $78,585,            
          total tax of $10,426, and tax due of $2,651.  When petitioners              
          filed their 1998 joint return, they did not pay the tax due shown           
          in that return.                                                             
               On May 18, 1998, respondent assessed petitioners’ tax, as              

               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect at all relevant times.  All Rule references are to the Tax           
          Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                      
               2Although the Court ordered petitioners to file a response             
          to respondent’s motion, petitioners failed to do so.                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011