Albert Horton and Ramona Osborne - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          Although not altogether clear, petitioners may be alleging in               
          their petition that the Appeals Office’s refusal to allow them to           
          continue making an audio recording of their Appeals Office                  
          hearing held on May 6, 2002, was improper under section                     
          7521(a)(1).  Except for that possible argument under section                
          7521(a)(1), the petition contains statements, contentions,                  
          arguments, and requests that the Court finds to be frivolous                
          and/or groundless.8                                                         
                                     Discussion                                       
               The Court may grant summary judgment where there is no                 
          genuine issue of material fact and a decision may be rendered as            
          a matter of law.  Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner,            
          98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994).  We             
          conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact                  
          regarding the questions raised in respondent’s motion.                      
               A taxpayer may raise challenges to the existence or the                
          amount of the taxpayer’s underlying tax liability if the taxpayer           
          did not receive a notice of deficiency or did not otherwise have            
          an opportunity to dispute the tax liability.  Sec. 6330(c)(2)(B).           
          Where the validity of the underlying tax liability is properly              

               8The frivolous and/or groundless statements, contentions,              
          arguments, and requests in petitioners’ petition are very similar           
          to the frivolous and/or groundless statements, contentions,                 
          arguments, and requests in petitions filed by certain other                 
          taxpayers with cases in the Court.  See, e.g., Copeland v.                  
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-46; Smith v. Commissioner, T.C.               
          Memo. 2003-45.                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011