George R. and Karen S. Kemper - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
               They filed bankruptcy on 01/31/2002, and the bankruptcy                
               was closed 06/12/2002. * * * Income tax liabilities for                
               1989, 1990, and 1991 are dischargeable per the Bank-                   
               ruptcy Code rules.                                                     
               When the taxpayers were mailed Letter 1058, Final                      
               Notice-Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your                     
               Right to a Hearing, the taxpayers responded with Form                  
               12153, attaching several pages of non-filer arguments.                 
               At the hearing the taxpayer was explained the Appeals                  
               process and he stated that he had been through several                 
               hearings before and that they were a waste of time.                    
               At the hearing Appeals provided the following docu-                    
               ments:                                                                 
                    a)   A copy of the memorandum of 5/2/02 stating                   
                         audio and stenographic recordings of Appeals                 
                         cases will no longer be allowed;                             
                    b)   Copies of the form 2866 to which the forms                   
                         4340, Certificate of Assessment, are annexed                 
                         for the period in dispute;                                   
                    c)   A copy of the pamphlet “Why do I have to Pay                 
                         Taxes”;                                                      
                    d)   A copy of “The Truth About Frivolous Tax                     
                         Arguments”;                                                  
                    e)   A list of I.R.C. code sections defining in-                  
                         come, who must file, etc.;                                   
               When Appeals tried to explain that the court could                     
               impose sanctions, he stated, “that no court case was                   
               like his.”  When Appeals again explained that sanctions                
               could indeed be imposed for the same types of arguments                
               the taxpayer was raising, he didn’t say anything.                      
               The taxpayer was asked if he were interested in collec-                
               tion alternatives such as an offer in compromise, or an                
               installment agreement, and was reminded that all re-                   
               turns due to date must be appropriately filed for the                  
               offer to be considered, or for an installment agree-                   
               ment, but he is not in filing compliance and was un-                   
               willing to discuss collection alternatives.  When asked                
               if all returns had been filed, he replied that he filed                
               what he felt were appropriate returns.                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011