- 11 - The taxpayer raised no non-frivolous issues. The information previously submitted by the taxpayers was reviewed, and in that material Karen Kemper raised no non-filer issues. Balancing the Need for Efficient Collection with Tax- payer Concerns The requirements of all applicable laws and administra- tive procedures have been met. The taxpayers received their required notices. At the hearing, Appeals raised collection alternatives with George Kemper, but he was not interested. Given the taxpayers’ continued non- compliance, the government should be allowed to proceed with its proposed enforcement action, its intent to levy on tax periods 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. Lacking the taxpayers’ cooperation, the proposed collection action balances the need for efficient collection with the taxpayer’s concern that any collection action be no more intrusive than necessary. [Reproduced literally] On October 29, 2002, petitioners filed a petition with the Court for review of petitioners’ notices of determination only insofar as those notices relate to petitioners’ unpaid liabili- ties for 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998. Except for an argument under section 7521(a)(1), the petition contains statements, contentions, arguments, and questions that the Court finds to be frivolous and/or groundless.7 With respect to section 7521(a)(1), petitioners allege in the petition that the Appeals Office refused to allow them to make an audio recording of the Appeals Office hearing held on August 29, 2002, and that that 7The frivolous and/or groundless statements, contentions, arguments, and questions in petitioners’ petition are very similar to the frivolous and/or groundless statements, conten- tions, arguments, and questions in petitions filed by certain other taxpayers with cases in the Court. See, e.g., Keown v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-69.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011