- 7 - On November 30, 2001, petitioner filed with respondent Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing.3 The request, which listed petitioner’s Las Vegas address, was accompanied by a two-page typewritten statement that acknowledged receipt of the foregoing Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to a Hearing Under IRC 6320. The statement included, inter alia, a challenge to the existence of the underlying tax liability for 1998, as well as allegations including: (1) Petitioner never received a “valid” notice of deficiency or a “statutory” notice and demand for payment and (2) the Appeals officer failed “to identify the statute that makes me ‘liable to pay’ the taxes at issue”. Petitioner also requested verification from the Secretary that all applicable laws and administrative procedures were followed with regard to the assessment and collection of the tax liability in question. D. The Appeals Office Hearing By letter dated March 8, 2002, Appeals Officer Jerry L. Johnson (the Appeals officer) scheduled an administrative hearing with petitioner in respondent’s Appeals Office in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Appeals officer then went on to state, in part, as follows: Please note that in circumstances where it is allowable to dispute the underlying liability * * * , the administrative appeal procedures do not extend to 3 The request was postmarked Nov. 26, 2001.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011