- 10 - 6673(a) for making frivolous and groundless arguments in a collection review proceeding. E. Respondent’s Notice of Determination On May 7, 2002, respondent’s Appeals Office mailed to petitioner, at his Las Vegas address, a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 with regard to his tax liability for 1998. In the notice, the Appeals Office concluded that respondent’s determination to proceed with collection should be sustained. F. Petitioner’s Petition On June 10, 2002, petitioner filed with the Court a Petition for Lien or Levy Action seeking review of respondent’s notice of determination. In the petition, petitioner identified his Las Vegas address as his current address, and he attached as exhibits a number of documents, including the notice of determination (see supra “E”). The petition includes allegations that: (1) The Appeals officer failed to obtain verification from the Secretary that the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure were met as required under section 6330(c)(1); (2) the Appeals officer failed to identify the statutes making petitioner liable for Federal income tax; (3) petitioner never received a “valid” notice of deficiency; (4) petitioner never received a “statutory” notice and demand for payment; and (5) petitioner was denied thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011