- 18 - Dr. Shapiro concluded that these 15th-percentile REITs data should be adjusted downward in petitioner’s favor to remove a liquidity premium that is inherent in REITs; i.e., a premium that arises because REIT interests, unlike the assets underlying them, are publicly traded in reasonably liquid markets. To gauge the size of this inherent liquidity premium, Dr. Shapiro referred to an academic study of private placement discounts for a period ending just before the valuation dates for the subject partnership interests. Bajaj et al., “Firm Value and Marketability Discounts”, 27 J. Corp. L. 89 (2001) (hereinafter the Bajaj study). On the basis of the Bajaj study, Dr. Shapiro concluded that, for the relevant time period, liquid assets such as REITs were trading at a premium of about 7.5 percent over illiquid assets such as the partnership interests. Subtracting this 7.5-percent liquidity premium from the previously indicated 15th-percentile REITs data, he concluded that the real estate component of the partnership interests should be valued to reflect minority interest discounts of 8.3 percent (-.8 minus 7.5) and 6 percent (1.48 minus 7.5), as of April 19, 1996, and July 2, 1996, respectively. Dr. Shapiro then compared these results to his own study which suggested that minority interests in holding companies trade at a discount of 8.5 percent relative to controlling interests in holding companies. Adjudging holding companies toPage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011