- 6 - property, not necessarily the recipient of the income. Eatinger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-310. Accordingly, military pension payments are includable in the gross income of the party or parties who have an ownership interest in the pension itself: A taxpayer who has a community property interest in a spouse’s military pension must, after divorce, include in her gross income the portion of the benefits paid which represents her interest in the pension, whether or not she directly receives such benefits, Id.; Weir v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-184, and a taxpayer who is awarded an ownership interest in a military pension as a division of marital property or pursuant to a divorce settlement must include her proportionate share of the benefits in her gross income. Witcher v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-292; Pfister v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-198. In the case at hand, there is nothing on the face of the divorce decree to indicate that petitioner was awarded an ownership interest in the pension. To the contrary, the court granted petitioner a monetary award in the amount of $1,017 per month, payable until the death of either petitioner or Mr. Newell. The court then ordered that this monetary award be satisfied through monthly payments to be paid directly by the government to petitioner, on behalf of Mr. Newell. Virginia law supports our conclusion that petitioner did not have an ownership interest in the pension. While Federal lawPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011