- 7 - controls how income from property interests are taxed, State law controls how property interests are created. United States v. Mitchell, 403 U.S. 190 (1971). It is clear that, at the time petitioner’s divorce decree was entered, the State court did not have the power to order a transfer of an ownership interest in Mr. Newell’s military retirement benefits to petitioner. Va. Code Ann. sec. 20-107.3(B) and (C) (Michie 1983); Lowe v. Lowe, 357 S.E.2d 31 (Va. 1987). Rather, the court merely had the authority to grant petitioner a monetary award; any transfer of an ownership interest in the pension only could have been effected by Mr. Newell with permission from the court. Va. Code Ann. sec. 20-107.3(D) (Michie 1983); Lowe v. Lowe, supra.3 There has been no suggestion of such a transfer in this case. We note that, at the time of petitioner’s divorce, Federal law had been revised to allow States to treat military pensions of married individuals as property held either jointly or separately by one or both spouses. Uniformed Services Former 3Cf. Pfister v. Commissioner, supra, in which we found that a Virginia divorce decree did transfer an ownership interest in a military retirement pension. In that case, we relied upon Va. Code sec. 20-107.3(H), which allowed a court to ratify and incorporate an agreement between the parties into the divorce decree. The ownership interest in Pfister was transferred pursuant to such an agreement between the parties--incorporated into the divorce decree--which provided that the spouse receiving the interest would “be owner of, and receive, one-half of husband’s disposable retired or retainer pay.” Id.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011