- 10 - Factors which indicate that the payments are in the nature of a property settlement rather than support are: (1) That the parties in their agreement (or the court in its decree) intended the payments to effect a division of their assets, (2) that the recipient surrendered valuable property rights in exchange for the payments, (3) that the payments are fixed in amount and not subject to contingencies, such as the death or remarriage of the recipient, (4) that the payments are secured, (5) that the amount of the payments plus the other property awarded to the recipient equals approximately one-half of the property accumulated by the parties during marriage, (6) that the need of the recipient was not taken into consideration in determining the amount of the payments, and (7) that a separate provision for support was provided elsewhere in the decree or agreement. Beard v. Commissioner, supra at 1284-1285. In the case at hand, the State court stated specifically in the divorce decree that the payments at issue were to be made to petitioner for her interest in the marital property. Furthermore, there was a separate provision for support distinct from the property settlement provisions. The property settlement payments are fixed in amount and the only contingencies applied to the payments are their termination upon the death of petitioner or Mr. Newell. Finally, there is no indication that petitioner’s needs were taken into account in the initial awardPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011