- 31 - affd. sub nom. Gibbons v. Commissioner, 155 F.3d 558 (4th Cir. 1998). B. Bad Debt Deductions Petitioner alleges that he made a portion of the payments to TCB as guarantor of real estate construction loans to Payne & Potter, Inc., which, because of its insolvent state, was in default. Petitioner alleges that the bad debt deductions ($14,000 for 1989 and $8,000 for 1990) arose out of the worthlessness of his right of recoupment against Payne & Potter, Inc. Here again, respondent has denied the deductions for lack of substantiation. The parties have stipulated that petitioner paid $34,443 in 1989 and $13,644 in 1990 to TCB. Petitioner alleges that he paid $14,000 in 1989 and $8,000 in 1990 to discharge his obligation as the guarantor of construction loans by TCB to Payne & Potter, Inc., which had become insolvent in 1986 and had defaulted on the loans. Because of his inability to recoup from Payne & Potter, Inc., the amount of those payments to TCB, petitioner claims that he is entitled to bad debt deductions of $14,000 and $8,000 for 1989 and 1990, respectively. Petitioner has failed to corroborate his oral testimony with written evidence of any loan (or loans) by TCB to Payne & Potter, Inc., or of any agreement whereby he became the guarantor of suchPage: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011