Jennifer L. Rusley - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
               1998.  During her employment with Arch, Jennifer held                  
               the position of Sales Executive in our Nashville, TN                   
               market.                                                                
                    Jennifer’s responsibilities were to service                       
               existing business and to solicit new business in a                     
               defined territory within the Nashville area.  The                      
               position was a business to business sales position,                    
               compensated with a base salary plus monthly                            
               commissions.  Jennifer was engaged in travel within her                
               assigned territory.                                                    
                    Jennifer sold Arch products and services, and                     
               received the commission portion of her pay based upon                  
               the revenue she derived for the company.                               
          The fourth letter provided respondent with a basis for                      
          concession, and the parties entered into a settlement stipulation           
          on October 24, 2001.  This Court’s decision, pursuant to the                
          agreement of the parties, that there is no deficiency in income             
          tax due from petitioner was entered on October 26, 2001.                    
               On January 18, 2002, petitioner filed a Motion for                     
          Administrative Costs, and the decision was vacated and set aside.           
          On March 19, 2002, respondent filed an Objection to Motion for              
          Administrative Costs.  On April 29, 2002, petitioner filed her              
          Response to Respondent’s Objection to Motion for Administrative             
          Costs.                                                                      
                                     Discussion                                       
               The prevailing party in an administrative proceeding may               
          recover reasonable administrative costs.  Sec. 7430(a); Rule 231.           
          A judgment for administrative costs incurred in connection with             
          an administrative proceeding may be awarded if:  (1) The taxpayer           
          is the “prevailing party”; (2) the taxpayer did not unreasonably            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011