Jennifer L. Rusley - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          of section 62 and may deduct business expenses on Schedule C).              
               Respondent contends that his position disallowing                      
          petitioner’s claimed Schedule C deductions was substantially                
          justified during the administrative process.  We agree.                     
          Petitioner filed her return, along with a Form W-2, listing                 
          income from USA Mobile.  She also reported related business                 
          expense deductions on Schedule C.  Petitioner has the                       
          responsibility to substantiate her status as a statutory employee           
          so that she may report her deductions on Schedule C.  See sec.              
          6001; Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 440 (2001); sec.                
          1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs.  As a common law employee,                    
          petitioner generally would be required to report her employee               
          business expense deductions on Schedule A.  In the absence of               
          further explanation on the return, or persuasive proof of                   
          petitioner’s status as a statutory employee, respondent was                 
          reasonable to challenge petitioner’s Schedule C expense                     
          deductions.                                                                 
               After respondent issued the 30-day letter, petitioner                  
          attempted to explain her filing position to respondent.  Her                
          explanations, though, were inconsistent and did not support her             
          use of Schedule C.  In the first letter, petitioner contradicted            
          her filing position and stated that the Form W-2 income belonged            
          on line 7 with related expenses on Schedule A.  In the second               
          letter petitioner reversed her argument again to affirm her                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011