- 7 - reasonableness of the Commissioner’s position. See Sokol v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 760, 767 (1989); Wasie v. Commissioner, supra. It is, however, “a relevant factor to consider in deciding the degree of the Commissioner’s justification.” Corkrey v. Commissioner, supra at 373. We review the Commissioner’s position as of the earlier of the date of the receipt by the taxpayer of the notice of decision by the Office of Appeals or the date of the notice of deficiency to determine whether respondent was substantially justified with respect to the recovery of administrative costs. Sec. 7430(c)(7)(B). Therefore, in the present case the relevant inquiry, with respect to the recovery of the administrative costs, is whether respondent had a reasonable basis for his position disallowing petitioner’s Schedule C expense deductions at the time of the issuance of the notice of deficiency (February 20, 2001). An individual’s adjusted gross income (AGI) is an individual’s gross income less specified deductions, including allowable deductions attributable to a trade or business carried on by the taxpayer, if such trade or business does not consist of the performance of services by the taxpayer as an employee. Sec. 62. Generally, miscellaneous itemized deductions, including business expenses under section 162, are deductible from an individual’s AGI only to the extent that the aggregate of thosePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011