T.C. Memo. 2003-152 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DAVID M. AND TERI L. SAYKALLY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent COMPUTER POWER SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 555-00, 1821-00. Filed May 27, 2003. P has extensive technical expertise in the computer software industry. P’s wholly owned corporation, C, was engaged in the marketing of software products. P and C entered into an agreement whereby P agreed to have research and development (R&D) done in order to create developed technology. Under the agreement, P would own the developed technology and license it to C in exchange for royalties. P intended that C would market the developed technology to its customers. P deducted his 1995 and 1996 R&D expenditures on Schedules C. R disallowed P’s R&D deductions on the ground that they were not incurred in a trade or business. Held: At all times, P intended to market the developed technology through C. P did not have the objective intent to use the developed technology in an activity that would constitute his own trade orPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011