Charles Shaw - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          bank records that those records would not support the                       
          determination).                                                             
               We conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and                 
          convincing evidence that petitioner had an underpayment for each            
          year in issue.7  Thus, petitioner is not liable for the fraud               
          penalty for 1993, 1994, or 1995.8                                           
          D.   Whether Petitioner Is Liable for the Accuracy-Related                  
               Penalty for 1993-95 Under Section 6662                                 
               In the alternative to fraud, respondent determined and                 
          contends that petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related                 
          penalty for negligence under section 6662 for 1993-95.                      
          Petitioner did not address this issue at trial or on brief.  A              
          taxpayer may be deemed to have conceded an issue that was raised            
          in the petition if he or she made no argument at trial or on                
          brief relating to that issue.  Levin v. Commissioner, 87 T.C.               
          698, 722-723 (1986), affd. 832 F.2d 403 (7th Cir. 1987);                    
          Zimmerman v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 94, 104 n.7 (1976).  We                  
          conclude that petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related                 
          penalty under section 6662(a) for 1993-95.                                  


               7  This case is similar to Chin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1994-54, in which the Commissioner used the bank deposits method            
          to reconstruct income, and we held that the Commissioner had not            
          shown by clear and convincing evidence that the taxpayer had an             
          underpayment.                                                               
               8  In light of our conclusion, we need not decide whether              
          respondent established by clear and convincing evidence that                
          petitioner intended to evade tax in each year in issue.                     




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011