- 19 - prerequisite to the Court’s jurisdiction and serves as a taxpayer’s ‘ticket’ to the Tax Court.” Bourekis v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 20, 26 (1998). There is nothing in the record to indicate that respondent intended for the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners to be considered a final determination letter under section 6404(g). See id.; Ho v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-363. Further, the parties stipulated that petitioners did not receive a written notice of determination from respondent denying a request for interest abatement. Petitioners assert that their interest abatement claim is properly before the Court because (1) interest was included in the notice of deficiency and a proposed stipulation-decision document, and (2) an Appeals officer verbally denied their interest abatement claim. However, because of the absence of a final determination letter denying a request for abatement of interest, the Court lacks jurisdiction under section 6404(g) to decide this issue. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Last modified: May 25, 2011