Charles W. and Nancy T. Smith - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               The sole issue for decision is whether a payment of $32,000            
          by Charles W. Smith (petitioner) to his former wife during 2000             
          constitutes alimony or a separate maintenance payment deductible            
          as an adjustment to gross income under section 215(a).  That                
          issue is resolved by whether the $32,000 payment satisfies the              
          definition of "alimony or separate maintenance payment" under               
          section 71(b)(1)(D).2                                                       
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioners were            
          legal residents of Auburndale, Florida.                                     
               Petitioner was formerly married to Sheila Doreen Wells from            
          May 20, 1978, until their divorce on April 25, 2000.  They had              
          two children of their marriage: Dawn Majetta Smith and Jeremy               
          Wiley Smith.                                                                
               At the time of their divorce, petitioner and his former wife           
          entered into a marital settlement agreement dated April 25, 2000.           
          That agreement was incorporated into the divorce decree of the              
          same date, entitled Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage               
          (the divorce decree).  Petitioner and his former wife were                  
          residents of Florida and were divorced by a Florida State court.            


               2    Other adjustments in the notice of deficiency, the                
          disallowance of a child care credit and a decrease in itemized              
          deductions are computational and will be resolved by the Court's            
          holding on the principal issue.                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011