- 4 - Petitioner paid the $32,000 to his former spouse during 2000. On their joint Federal income tax return for 2000, petitioners claimed a deduction for the $32,000 lump-sum alimony payment. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the deduction on the ground that the $32,000 payment was not alimony under section 71(b)(1)(D). For tax purposes, the term "alimony or separate maintenance payment" is defined in section 71(b)(1) as any payment in cash meeting the following four criteria: (A) such payment is received by (or on behalf of) a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument, (B) the divorce or separation instrument does not designate such payment as a payment which is not includible in gross income under this section and not allowable as a deduction under section 215, (C) in the case of an individual legally separated from his spouse under a decree of divorce or of separate maintenance, the payee spouse and the payor spouse are not members of the same household at the time such payment is made, and (D) there is no liability to make any such payment for any period after the death of the payee spouse and there is no liability to make any payment (in cash or property) as a substitute for such payments after the death of the payee spouse. Petitioner's deduction for alimony is allowable only if the four criteria of section 71(b)(1) are met. Jaffe v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-196. Respondent agrees that the requisites of section 71(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) have been met, but argues thatPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011