- 2 - petitioners with respect to their 1992 through 1996 tax years. The trial in these cases had been scheduled for the Court’s Denver, Colorado, Trial Session commencing May 12, 2003.2 These cases had been set for a time and date certain of May 19, 2003. On the morning of May 19, 2003, these cases were called, and petitioners failed to appear. Respondent moved to dismiss both cases for petitioners’ lack of prosecution. We shall grant respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, and decisions will be entered by default. Given the serious consequences of this action, we find it appropriate to explain the events in these cases. In the notices of deficiency for docket Nos. 8747-00 and 11725-02, dated May 18, 2000, and April 17, 2002, respectively, respondent determined the following income tax deficiencies and additions to tax for petitioners: Docket Additions to Tax Number Year Deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) Sec. 6662 8747-00 1992 $6,736 none $1,347 8747-00 1993 21,167 $7,981 4,233 8747-00 1994 15,394 7,198 3,079 11725-02 1995 82,929 20,325 16,586 11725-02 1996 55,290 13,822 11,058 2 With respect to docket No. 8747-00, the May 12, 2003, setting was a continuation of a trial that had commenced during spring 2002, resumed in summer 2002, and had been delayed to enable the parties to incorporate and consolidate docket No. 11725-02, which involves subsequent tax years for the same petitioners.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011