- 14 - Failure To Properly Prosecute and the record and transcripts in these cases (as described in the historical summary set forth above) respondent’s Motion will be granted and decisions entered for respondent.5 “The sanction of dismissal is the most severe sanction that a court may apply, and its use must be tempered by a careful exercise of judicial discretion.” Durgin v. Graham, 372 F.2d 130, 131 (5th Cir. 1967); Freedson v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 931, 937 (1977), affd. 565 F.2d 954 (5th Cir. 1978). Petitioners, both of whom are experienced practicing lawyers, ignored this Court’s Orders and process. Further, they have failed to comply with Pretrial Orders and Court Rules requiring the preparation of their cases, including the requirement to meet and/or work with counsel for respondent to exchange documents and information, stipulate facts, and otherwise to prepare for trial. Since September 2001, petitioners were provided with additional time to remedy their failure to comply. In each of the numerous instances that petitioners’ cases were called for trial, or trial was resumed, they failed to correct or to remedy their prior failures, and little or no progress had been made from the time before, even though the Court took great pains to detail what was 5 Respondent, in his Motion for dismissal under consideration seeks the entry of decisions for deficiencies that, in some instances, are reduced in amount from the amounts determined in the notices of deficiency.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011