- 106 - f. Reasonable Compensation Established for Each Retained Executive Having concluded that 13 of the companies identified by the experts are comparable, that Ms. Meyer’s selection of comparable executives within those companies and her computation of their 1992 compensation is more reliable than Mr. Rosenbloom’s, and that reasonable compensation in 1992 for the Retained Executives would be an amount not exceeding the 90th percentile of the range of compensation paid to comparable executives in that year, we proceed to consider each Retained Executive and the amount of compensation shown to have been reasonable for him in 1992. (i) Mr. Brink Ms. Meyer identified 13 executives in her rebuttal report that she considered comparable to Mr. Brink in 1992. We conclude that three of those executives should be disregarded, as follows: Mr. Casey of Litton Industries, Inc., due to our previous determination that Litton Industries, Inc., is not comparable to petitioner; plus Mr. Reiland of Magnetek, Inc., and Mr. Everett of Raychem Corp., because as noted the proxy disclosures of those companies for 1992 are not comparable to the remaining companies, having been made prior to October 1992 regulatory changes governing disclosure formats. We conclude that the 10 remaining executives are comparable. For the reasons previously outlined, we use Ms. Meyer’s computation of their 1992 compensation. However, one significantPage: Previous 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011