Square D Company and Subsidiaries - Page 70

                                       - 49 -                                         
          was unable to pay the loan commitment or legal fees or that                 
          petitioner’s failure to pay would have adversely affected                   
          petitioner; indeed, Schneider remained legally obligated, and it            
          initially paid the loan commitment fee.                                     
               Nonetheless, we agree with petitioner that legal obligation            
          is not dispositive and conclude that the loan commitment and                
          legal fees are deductible by petitioner because Schneider                   
          incurred those costs on behalf of ACQ, and by extension                     
          petitioner, so that petitioner could obtain the Bridge Loan.                
          The facts and holding of Waring Prods. Corp. v. Commissioner, 27            
          T.C. 921 (1957), are instructive.  The taxpayer was a corporation           
          organized to hold and exploit certain patents.  It attempted to             
          enter into a contract with a manufacturer to assemble and ship              
          its patented products, but the manufacturer refused because of              
          the taxpayer’s poor credit rating.  To aid the taxpayer, a major            
          corporate shareholder, who later acquired all the taxpayer’s                
          stock, becoming its parent, agreed to enter into a contract                 
          directly with the manufacturer, “pledging its own credit on                 
          behalf of” the taxpayer.  Id. at 924.  The manufacturer at first            
          invoiced the shareholder, but later the taxpayer, for the                   
          finished products, and the taxpayer made all payments on the                
          invoices.  The shareholder, however, was never relieved of its              
          obligations to the manufacturer under the contract.                         








Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011