- 13 - a motion to dismiss (the motions to dismiss) and denied.3 In those motions, petitioners reiterated their claims that we lack jurisdiction and stated that they wished to withdraw their petitions: “Petitioner hereby gives Notice of WITHDRAWAL of the petition for review by the United States Tax Court. This Notice of Withdrawal of petition makes moot, voids, and cancels all proceedings previously scheduled by this Court for action upon the petition filed in error.” Trial Session These cases were called from the calendar at the Court’s trial session commencing on Monday, December 3, 2001, in Houston, Texas. On Friday, November 30, 2001, an employee of the Court Clerk’s Office contacted petitioners and reminded them that they were expected to appear at the call of the calendar on Monday, December 3. When, on that date, the cases were called from the calendar, petitioners failed to appear. Counsel for respondent appeared and announced ready for trial. The Court set the cases for trial on Tuesday, December 4, 2001, at 9:00 a.m., and directed the deputy trial clerk to contact petitioners by telephone and notify them of the date and time of the trial. When the cases were recalled from the calendar on December 4, for 3 To the extent petitioners were relying on grounds other than jurisdiction, a decision dismissing the proceedings would have been considered a decision sustaining the deficiencies determined by respondent. See sec. 7459(d). Since we did not believe that was the result petitioners intended, we denied the motions to dismiss.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011