Robert W. Tschetter - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          personal, family, and living expenses and that payments of these            
          expenses by Wolf Creek Farm constitute constructive dividends to            
          Mr. Tschetter.  On the other hand, petitioners assert that all              
          the expenditures are reasonable and necessary business expenses,            
          deductible by Wolf Creek Farm and excluded from Mr. Tschetter’s             
          income.                                                                     
               Petitioners contend that the medical costs are employee                
          benefits, deductible by the employer and excludable from the                
          employee’s income under sections 105 and/or 106.  Petitioners               
          further maintain that Wolf Creek Farm provided food and lodging             
          to Mr. Tschetter in his capacity as an employee and that such was           
          done for the convenience of Wolf Creek Farm.  Consequently,                 
          petitioners assert that the food and lodging expenses are                   
          employer-provided “meals and lodging”, the costs for which are              
          excluded from Mr. Tschetter’s income under section 119 and                  
          deductible by Wolf Creek Farm.  Petitioners further assert that,            
          as owner and lessor of the farmhouse, Wolf Creek Farm is entitled           
          to deduct (1) the expenditures for insurance on the farmhouse as            
          reasonable and necessary business expenses under section 162, (2)           
          the property taxes under either section 162 or 164, and (3) the             
          depreciation of the farmhouse under section 167.  Petitioners               
          posit that these latter expenses are not Mr. Tschetter’s personal           
          expenses because he is not the owner of the property.                       








Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011