Mitchell S. Wiest - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          that respondent abused his discretion in denying petitioner                 
          relief under section 6015(f).                                               
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.  We           
          incorporate by this reference the stipulation of facts and                  
          attached exhibits.                                                          
               At the time of filing of the petition, petitioner resided in           
          Mt. Juliet, Tennessee.                                                      
               Petitioner and his wife during 1994, Michelle Wiest (Ms.               
          Wiest), filed a joint Federal income tax return for that year               
          (the 1994 return).  Ms. Wiest engaged a high school acquaintance            
          employed at a tax return preparer (H & R Block) to prepare the              
          1994 return and gave the preparer Forms W-2, Wage and Tax                   
          Statement, for herself and petitioner.  Petitioner had given his            
          Forms W-2 to Ms. Wiest for this purpose.                                    
               The 1994 return reflected a balance due of $4,062.  After              
          the 1994 return was completed, petitioner and Ms. Wiest signed              
          it.  On the 1994 return, petitioner and Ms. Wiest reported wages            
          of $72,138, of which $29,904 was petitioner’s and $42,234 was Ms.           
          Wiest’s.  Petitioner’s Federal income tax withholding totaled               
          $2,696, and Ms. Wiest’s totaled $1,918.                                     
               Ms. Wiest assumed responsibility for having the couple’s tax           
          returns prepared and for filing them with respondent.  With                 
          respect to the 1994 return, after petitioner and Ms. Wiest signed           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011