- 8 - determination letter denied relief under section 6015(f).4 We consider whether respondent’s determination was an abuse of discretion. A. Knowledge or Reason To Know The determination letter found that petitioner had knowledge or reason to know of the underpayment, based solely on the fact that he signed the 1994 return.5 While there is no longer any dispute that petitioner signed the return, as he conceded the signature was his upon seeing the return again in connection with these proceedings, the fact that he signed the return does not establish the actual or constructive knowledge that is relevant in the case of a liability that is reported on a return but not paid.6 The relevant knowledge in the case of a reported but unpaid liability, as respondent’s own published guidance points out, is whether the taxpayer knew or had reason to know “that the 4 The determination letter in addition considered certain factors supportive of relief (namely, petitioner’s divorced status and the fact that there was no known significant benefit from the underpayment beyond normal support), as well as factors weighing against relief (namely, the absence of hardship or marital abuse). The determination letter also identified a neutral factor; namely, the failure of the couple’s divorce decree to address tax debts. 5 The determination letter states: “His signature on the return appears good. Therefore, he knew of the underpayment at one time.” (Emphasis added.) 6 If signing a joint return that reports a liability is sufficient to establish actual or constructive knowledge of an underpayment, then no taxpayer signing such a joint return would ever lack knowledge or reason to know of the underpayment.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011