Mitchell S. Wiest - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          Petitioner requested relief on two grounds:  (1) That since he              
          was married and raising five children, the correct amount of tax            
          was withheld from his salary, and therefore that the liability              
          reported on the 1994 return arose solely from insufficient                  
          withholding on the part of Ms. Wiest; and (2) that he had relied            
          on Ms. Wiest to file the 1994 return and pay the amount shown as            
          due thereon.                                                                
               On December 10, 1999, respondent issued petitioner a                   
          determination letter setting forth his determination that                   
          petitioner did not qualify for innocent spouse relief.  The                 
          determination letter concluded that petitioner did not qualify              
          for relief under section 6015(b) and (c).  As to equitable relief           
          under section 6015(f), the determination letter provided that               
          “underpayment was evident at the signing of the joint return.               
          The taxpayer would have had knowledge/reason to know of the                 
          underpayment at the time of signing the tax return.”  A fuller              
          discussion, on a Form 886A, Explanation of Items, attached to the           
          determination letter, provided as follows:                                  
                    Marital status--Taxpayers are currently divorced                  
               ..as of 9-23-97.  Taxpayer husband filed Form 8857 on                  
               March 4, 1999.                                                         
                    Attribution—Taxpayer states he does not remember                  
               signing the return.  His signature is very identifiable                
               and was compared to that on the return.  His signature                 
               on return appears good.  Therefore, he knew of the                     
               underpayment at one time.  Agent proportioned balance                  
               due with underpayment.  The breakdown is that the                      
               responsibility of the underpayment is 37% caused by the                
               taxpayer husbands [sic] inadequate withholding and 63%                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011