- 3 - By letter dated September 10, 1994, and showing the Madeira Drive address, petitioner requested additional time to respond to this request. On April 4, 1995, respondent received from petitioner a purported Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, listing his principal business as “Property Inspector”, showing $8,416 of previously unreported income from “Gross receipts or sales”, and claiming $2,672.72 of previously unclaimed business expenses, including alleged expenses for travel, film, pager, and “walking shoes”. Notice of Deficiency By notice of deficiency dated May 17, 1995, and mailed to the Madeira Drive address, respondent adjusted petitioner’s income to include $10,744 of nonemployee compensation and determined a $2,782 deficiency in petitioner’s 1992 Federal income tax and a $556 accuracy-related penalty pursuant to section 6662. In the notice of deficiency, respondent allowed petitioner no business expense deduction. The notice of deficiency contained instructions for filing a petition with the Tax Court, and indicated that any Tax Court petition should be filed within 90 days (i.e., by August 15, 1995). On June 15, 1995, respondent received from petitioner correspondence, stating: “Here are the copies of milege [sic], & film & pager & auto care for 92 tax return.” Included in this correspondence, along with handwritten mileage logs andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011