- 9 - Upon request, the taxpayer is entitled to an administrative hearing before the Appeals Office of the IRS. Sec. 6330(b)(1). A face-to-face hearing is not invariably required: If a taxpayer is given a reasonable opportunity for a hearing but fails to take advantage of it, the Appeals Office may make a determination on the basis of the case file. See, e.g., Leineweber v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-17; Armstrong v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-224; sec. 301.6330-1(d)(2), Q&A-D6 and D7, Proced. & Admin. Regs. Respondent sent petitioner a letter, dated October 11, 2001, and addressed to the Parker Lane #11 address, advising petitioner that he would soon be contacted regarding his hearing. A short time later, Appeals Officer Cody mailed petitioner a letter, dated October 18, 2001, and also addressed to the Parker Lane #11 address, scheduling the hearing. This letter was returned to sender with a notation that the United States Postal Service was unable to forward it. The nub of petitioner’s complaint, as we understand it, is that once the October 18 letter was returned, the Appeals Office was on notice that Parker Lane #11 was no longer petitioner’s current address. Construed broadly, petitioner’s argument seems to be that the Appeals Office failed to exercise due diligence in discovering his new address.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011