- 13 - verification of legal and procedural requirements, however, the attachments refer twice to petitioner’s 1998 tax year and once to petitioner’s 1998 account. Petitioner seizes upon these misstatements as establishing the invalidity of the notices of determination and infirmities in the administrative process. When read in the context of other information in the notices, which makes it clear that the notices relate to petitioner’s 1992 tax year, and of other materials in the administrative file, the references to petitioner’s 1998 tax year are plainly typographical errors, as Appeals Officer Cody declares in her affidavit, which is in evidence.10 The evidence shows that Cody reviewed, among other things, respondent’s final notice of intent to levy, the transcripts of petitioner’s account, and the case history leading up to the collection action in question. Her review of the transcripts and other materials satisfies the section 6330(c)(1) requirement that the hearing officer “obtain verification from the Secretary that the requirements of any applicable law or administrative 10 For instance, the attachment to each notice of determination states: “IDRS shows an assessment of tax, penalty and applicable interest made on the 1998 tax period”. The next sentence, however, states: “This assessment was made on 10/16/1995.” This latter date corresponds with the date that petitioner was sent the statutory notice of balance due for his 1992 taxes, as indicated by the plain-language transcript of petitioner’s 1992 account that is in evidence.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011