- 8 - petitioner in a year from a group were considered excessive in light of the total medical claims paid by petitioner during the year on behalf of the group and its members. Cost-plus group contracts simply represented a variation of experience-rated group contracts. Premiums on cost-plus group contracts would be calculated for the following year based upon claims submitted to petitioner and petitioner’s administrative costs relating to each group for a year. Cost-plus group contracts offered by petitioner had a retrospective adjustment feature that, where applicable, adjusted the total premiums received by petitioner for a year to reflect the group’s actual claims and petitioner’s administrative costs for the year relating to the group. Other Matter As indicated, the rating formulas used by petitioner to determine the premium rates for its group contracts were subject to annual approval by the PID. Unless terminated, community-rated group contracts were automatically renewed with petitioner on a month-to-month basis, and experience-rated and cost-plus group contracts were automatically renewed with petitioner on an annual basis. Regardless, however, of the nominal renewal terms associated with petitioner’s group contracts, as a practical matter, all of petitioner’s group contracts were effectively terminable at willPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011