Chief Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          expense under section 162(a).  Given our conclusion that it is,             
          we decide second whether its deduction is precluded by section              
          162(k), which applies to payments made “in connection with” the             
          reacquisition of stock.                                                     
          1.   Section 162(a)                                                         
               Section 162(a) allows a deduction for all ordinary and                 
          necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in              
          carrying on any trade or business.  To qualify for a deduction              
          under section 162(a), an item must (1) be paid or incurred during           
          the taxable year, (2) be for carrying on any trade or business,             
          (3) be an expense, (4) be a necessary expense, and (5) be an                
          ordinary expense.  Commissioner v. Lincoln Sav. & Loan                      
          Association, 403 U.S. 345 (1971); Wells Fargo & Co. v.                      
          Commissioner, 224 F.3d 874 (8th Cir. 2000), affg. in part and               
          revg. in part Norwest Corp. v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 89 (1999);            
          Lychuk v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 374 (2001).                                
               Respondent argues that petitioner may not deduct its payment           
          of $3,082,710 to V. Eihusen under section 162(a) for many of the            
          same reasons respondent advances in connection with section                 
          162(k); namely, that the payment was made in connection with                
          petitioner’s reacquisition of its stock, or, in other words, in             
          connection with an acquisition of a capital asset.  Respondent              
          also argues for purposes of section 162(a) that the payment in              
          question is a capital expenditure because the claims settled by             






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011