William J. Cutts - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be           
          cited as authority.                                                         
               Respondent determined the following deficiencies and                   
          penalties with respect to petitioners William J. Cutts (Mr.                 
          Cutts) and American Tank & Vessel Inc. (ATV):                               
                                                       Accuracy-Related               
                                                      Penalty                        
          Petitioner       TYE          Deficiency      Sec. 6662(a)                  
          Mr. Cutts      12/31/97       $9,838          $1,968                        
          ATV       9/30/97             4,508          902                            
          For convenience, we refer to the tax years collectively as                  
          petitioners’ 1997 tax year or the 1997 year.                                
               After giving effect to a partial concession by respondent,2            
          the issues remaining for decision are:                                      
               1.  Whether ATV or Mr. Cutts is entitled to deductions for             
          expenses with respect to land and buildings known as Landmark               
          Hall in excess of the amounts allowed in the notices of                     
          deficiency, and whether Mr. Cutts received constructive dividends           
          for Landmark Hall expenses disallowed to ATV.  We hold ATV is               
          entitled to deduct rent and utility expenses, but not pool repair           
          expenses, for Landmark Hall in excess of those allowed in the               
          notice of deficiency.  We hold Mr. Cutts received constructive              
          dividends for Landmark Hall utility expenses disallowed to ATV.             


               2Respondent concedes petitioners are not liable for the sec.           
          6662(a) penalty for any part of the deficiencies attributable to            
          adjustments for the use of Landmark Hall.                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011