William J. Cutts - Page 11

                                       - 10 -                                         
               The amounts owed by Mr. Cutts to ATV represent personal                
          items purchased by Mr. Cutts with ATV’s credit card and child               
          support payments made on his behalf by ATV.  The amounts owed by            
          ATV to Mr. Cutts represent ATV’s monthly Landmark Hall rental               
          obligations, reduced by Landmark Hall mortgage payments made on             
          Mr. Cutts’s behalf by ATV.  The total amount due Mr. Cutts from             
          ATV increased by $3,611 each month, apparently representing the             
          excess of ATV’s rental obligations over the required payments on            
          the Landmark Hall mortgage; the total amount due ATV from Mr.               
          Cutts increased and decreased by different amounts each month.              
               As of September 30, 1997, there are entries in the ledgers             
          showing $199,089.05 of the amount due Mr. Cutts from ATV as                 
          credited against the amount due ATV from Mr. Cutts.  For the                
          entire period October 1, 1996 - December 31, 1997--the 1997 tax             
          year--there are no entries in the ledgers making any other credit           
          transfers between the two accounts.                                         
          Discussion                                                                  
          Issue 1.  ATV’s Right to Landmark Hall Expense Deductions and Mr.           
                    Cutts’s Exposure to Constructive Dividends From ATV               
               Petitioners argue that even if Mr. Cutts were allocated more           
          than 5 percent personal use of Landmark Hall, Mr. Cutts would not           
          have rent or dividend income to the extent the $78,000 annual               
          rent paid by ATV for the use of 95 percent of Landmark Hall was             
          less than fair market rent.  There is no evidence in the record             
          of what the fair market value or fair market rent of Landmark               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011