- 30 - 6015(f) was an abuse of discretion, and that, on the basis of all the facts and circumstances, it would be inequitable to hold petitioner liable for the underpayment of tax for 1995. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for petitioner. Reviewed by the Court. WELLS, COHEN, SWIFT, GERBER, LARO, VASQUEZ, GALE, THORNTON, HAINES, GOEKE, and KROUPA, JJ., agree with this majority opinion. WHERRY, J., concurs in result only.Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011