- 38 -                                         
          remaining irrigation water (16,000 acre feet) would be sold after           
          another 10 years.                                                           
               We use a base price of $450 per acre foot for the potential            
          water, as we did for the unused water, taking into account                  
          inflation.  The base price for the potential water should be                
          discounted by a higher rate than that used for the unused water.            
          It is only by speculation that we assume any of this water will             
          become available.  The regulatory, economic, and legislative                
          uncertainty surrounding a future sale of the unused water is                
          matched, and possibly exceeded, by the speculative nature of the            
          potential water supply.  Therefore, we conclude that a 20-percent           
          discount is appropriate in valuing this water.  This scenario               
          would result in a payment 10 years after the valuation date of              
          $11,742,959, and a payment 20 years after the valuation date of             
          $12,625,244.  Applying a discount rate of 20 percent, the value             
          of the potential water on the valuation date was $2,225,871.                
          V.   Conclusion                                                             
               We conclude that on January 1, 1997, the fair market values            
          of the components of petitioner’s water right were as follows:              
          Irrigation      Corpus      Unused      Potential       Total               
                          Christi                                                     
          $3,742,062    $9,853,428               $2,225,871    $22,532,519           
                                    $6,711,157                                        
          While this value is significantly less than the amount paid by              
          the LCRA after the political climate settled favorably to                   
          petitioner’s position as seller, such result simply was not                 
Page:  Previous   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011