- 10 - sections 7701(a)(11)(B) and (12)(A)(i), 7803(a)(2)). The Commissioner’s authority to issue a final notice of intent to levy has been delegated to GS-9 and above revenue officers. Everman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-137 (citing Delegation Order No. 191 (Rev. 2; Oct. 1, 1999) (Rev.3; June 11, 2001)). Michael C. Sutton, the revenue officer who issued the final notice of intent to levy to petitioners on July 2, 2002, was classified as a GS-11 at the time he issued the notice. The notice of intent to levy in this case was valid as it was issued to petitioners by a revenue officer with delegated authority to do so. Petitioners Are Persons Subject to Levy Petitioners’ argument that they are not persons subject to levy under section 6331(a) is also without merit. Section 6331(a) specifically authorizes the Secretary to collect unpaid taxes from any person by levy upon all property and rights to property belonging to such person. Section 7701(a)(1) defines “person” to include an individual. Petitioners are individuals under section 7701(a)(1) and, therefore, are subject to levy under section 6331(a). No Signature by Commissioner Although petitioners’ argument is unclear, we shall interpret the cryptic reference, “no Commissioner signature”, to mean that the final notice of intent to levy was invalid becausePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011