Robert & Polly A. Gatlos - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          sections 7701(a)(11)(B) and (12)(A)(i), 7803(a)(2)).  The                   
          Commissioner’s authority to issue a final notice of intent to               
          levy has been delegated to GS-9 and above revenue officers.                 
          Everman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-137 (citing Delegation             
          Order No. 191 (Rev. 2; Oct. 1, 1999) (Rev.3; June 11, 2001)).               
          Michael C. Sutton, the revenue officer who issued the final                 
          notice of intent to levy to petitioners on July 2, 2002, was                
          classified as a GS-11 at the time he issued the notice.  The                
          notice of intent to levy in this case was valid as it was issued            
          to petitioners by a revenue officer with delegated authority to             
          do so.                                                                      
                    Petitioners Are Persons Subject to Levy                           
               Petitioners’ argument that they are not persons subject to             
          levy under section 6331(a) is also without merit.  Section                  
          6331(a) specifically authorizes the Secretary to collect unpaid             
          taxes from any person by levy upon all property and rights to               
          property belonging to such person.  Section 7701(a)(1) defines              
          “person” to include an individual.  Petitioners are individuals             
          under section 7701(a)(1) and, therefore, are subject to levy                
          under section 6331(a).                                                      
                    No Signature by Commissioner                                      
               Although petitioners’ argument is unclear, we shall                    
          interpret the cryptic reference, “no Commissioner signature”, to            
          mean that the final notice of intent to levy was invalid because            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011