Robert & Polly A. Gatlos - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          arguments.  After respondent filed his motion for summary                   
          judgment and we issued an order requiring petitioners to respond,           
          petitioners did not comply with our order and did not file the              
          required response.                                                          
               Petitioners’ conduct as summarized in this opinion                     
          demonstrates that this proceeding was instituted and maintained             
          primarily for delay.  Moreover, every argument made by                      
          petitioners during the administrative appeal and in this Court              
          was frivolous and/or groundless.  Consequently, a penalty under             
          section 6673(a)(1) is warranted.  We shall require petitioners to           
          pay to the United States a penalty under section 6673(a)(1) of              
          $2,000.                                                                     
                                                  An appropriate order and            
                                             decision will be entered.                




                                                                                     


















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011