- 12 - taxpayer’s position is frivolous or groundless. Section 6673(a)(1) applies to proceedings under section 6330. Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581 (2000). In proceedings under section 6330, we have imposed the penalty on taxpayers who have raised frivolous and groundless arguments with respect to the legality of the Federal tax laws. See, e.g., Roberts v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 365, 372-373 (2002), affd. 329 F.3d 1224 (11th Cir. 2003); Eiselstein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-22; Yacksyzn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-99. In this case, the record for purposes of respondent’s motion clearly establishes that the only arguments made by petitioners during the administrative processing of this case were frivolous and/or groundless. In their “Claim for Relief From Alleged Notice of Lien or Levy”, petitioners argued, among other things, that they are not liable for income tax, and they challenged the Secretary’s delegation of authority to IRS employees to collect unpaid taxes. In their letter to respondent dated December 28, 2002, petitioners again raised several frivolous arguments including an argument that their tax liabilities were invalid because the Sixteenth Amendment does not authorize a direct, nonapportioned income tax on citizens. At the hearing, Mrs. Gatlos again raised frivolous arguments regarding the constitutionality of the income tax. In their petition, petitioners continued to assert frivolous and/or groundlessPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011