Kenneth W. and Fayetta Graves - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662.  After concessions,            
          the issues remaining for our consideration are:  (1) Whether                
          Kenneth W. Graves’s (petitioner) bad debt, which arose in the               
          course of his business as an employee, is deductible in computing           
          adjusted gross income or an itemized deduction in computing                 
          taxable income; (2) whether the bad debt is $85,009 as determined           
          by respondent or $86,040 as now claimed by petitioners; and (3)             
          whether petitioners are liable for the addition to tax and                  
          penalty under sections 6651(a)(1) and 6662, respectively.                   
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT2                                   
               Petitioners resided in San Dimas, California, on the date              
          their petition was filed.  They filed a joint Federal income tax            
          return for their 1996 taxable year.  With respect to their 1996             
          return, petitioners sought a filing extension to August 15, 1997.           
          No further extensions were sought after the expiration of the               
          extension.  Twenty months later, on April 16, 1999, petitioners             
          filed their 1996 Federal income tax return.  During 1996,                   
          petitioners received interest income.  Petitioner received                  
          pension income and unemployment compensation as well as a salary.           
          Mrs. Graves3 received salary and miscellaneous income as an                 
          employee of two companies.                                                  


               2 The parties’ stipulation of facts is incorporated by this            
          reference.                                                                  
               3 Mrs. Graves is a party in this case because petitioners              
          filed a joint return for 1996.                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011