Kenneth W. and Fayetta Graves - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          business consists of the performance of services as an employee,            
          he may not deduct the business bad debt to arrive at adjusted               
          gross income under section 62.  Accordingly, petitioner’s                   
          business bad debt must be treated as an itemized deduction under            
          section 63(d).                                                              
               Because the business bad debt is deductible as an itemized             
          deduction, it is subject to the 2-percent floor under section 67.           
          Section 67(a) provides in pertinent part:  “In the case of an               
          individual, the miscellaneous itemized deductions for any taxable           
          year shall be allowed only to the extent that the aggregate of              
          such deductions exceeds 2 percent of adjusted gross income.”                
          Section 67(b) defines miscellaneous itemized deductions as                  
          itemized deductions that are not listed therein.  Section 166               
          business bad debts are not listed under section 67(b).                      
          Therefore, we hold that petitioner’s business bad debt deduction            
          is a miscellaneous itemized deduction and is subject to the 2-              
          percent floor under section 67.                                             
          Amount of Business Bad Debt                                                 
               We next consider the amount of petitioner’s business bad               
          debt deduction.8  The parties disagree on the amount to be                  
          deducted.  Petitioners initially deducted $84,734 on their                  
          Federal income tax return.  After examination, respondent allowed           


               8 As previously noted, no question has been raised with                
          respect to the burden of proof or production under sec. 7491(a).            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011