Paul S. Lindsey, Jr. and Kristen L. Lindsey - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          other propane companies for the benefit of SYN.  EGC dealt                  
          primarily with smaller companies and introduced larger multi                
          state companies to representatives of NGC.  In late 1995 or early           
          1996, petitioner introduced NGC to representatives of Coast Gas,            
          a propane retailer.                                                         
          Dispute Between EGC and NGC                                                 
               In late spring or early summer of 1996, representatives of             
          NGC met with petitioner to discuss the possibility of terminating           
          NGC and SYN’s relationship with EGC.  Shortly thereafter,                   
          petitioner learned that NGC was going to acquire not only Coast             
          Gas, but also Empire Energy, a company that was originally part             
          of EGC.  Petitioner also learned that NGC did not intend for EGC            
          to manage SYN in the future.  Petitioner believed NGC’s actions             
          violated the agreement between EGC and NGC with respect to the              
          management of SYN.                                                          
               On September 20, 1996, EGC sought and obtained a temporary             
          restraining order to halt NGC’s acquisition of Empire Energy.  On           
          September 22, 1996, petitioner and Valerie Schall (Schall), an              
          executive vice president of EGC, met with Dick Hylland (Hylland)            
          and Dan Newell (Newell), representatives of NGC, in an attempt to           
          resolve all issues and potential claims that arose or might have            
          arisen from the dispute between EGC and NGC over the operation of           
          SYN (the dispute).  During that meeting, Schall raised a claim              
          for compensation due petitioner as a result of the dispute.                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011