Paul S. Lindsey, Jr. and Kristen L. Lindsey - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          interference with contracts, for personal injury including injury           
          to [petitioner’s] personal and professional reputation and                  
          emotional distress, [and] humiliation and embarrassment”.                   
          Petitioners argue that, because the termination agreement                   
          specifically sets forth the claims that formed the basis for                
          settlement, we need not look to the intent of the payor.                    
               Assuming, arguendo, that the claims stated in the                      
          termination agreement accurately reflect the basis for                      
          settlement, any amount received on such basis is nevertheless               
          includable in gross income because it was not received on account           
          of personal physical injury or physical sickness within the                 
          meaning of section 104(a)(2).  As explained above, Congress                 
          explicitly excluded from the definition of physical injuries or             
          physical sickness emotional distress and related injuries.  Sec.            
          104(a); see H. Conf. Rept. 104-737, at 301 n.56, supra, 1996-3              
          C.B. at 1041 n.56.  Injury to reputation, humiliation, and                  
          embarrassment are akin to emotional distress.  See Shaltz v.                
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-173.  Moreover, tortious                      
          interference with contracts is an economic injury, not a physical           
          injury, and so damages received on account thereof are not                  
          excludable under section 104(a)(2).  See Robinson v.                        
          Commissioner, 102 T.C. 126.                                                 
               Petitioners nevertheless argue that petitioner suffered a              
          physical injury.  In support thereof, petitioners presented the             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011