- 38 - extent of the distributing corporation’s E&P;47 any excess is nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the taxpayer’s basis; and any remaining amount received is taxable as capital gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset. Sec. 301(c)(1),(2), and (3); Truesdell v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1280, 1295-1298 (1987); Barnard v. Commissioner, supra. “It is well established that when controlling shareholders divert corporate income to themselves, it is proper to treat such diverted funds as constructive dividends for tax purposes.” DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. at 883. As stated more fully above, the Commissioner’s deficiency determination is presumptively correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of showing that determination is erroneous. See Rule 142(a); Zack v. Commissioner, 692 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1982); DiLeo v. Commissioner, supra at 871. Respondent’s deficiency determination included those amounts diverted from Alviso and GMT. Under these circumstances, petitioner bears the burden of showing that Alviso and GMT did not have sufficient E&P to deem the subject “distributions” to be constructive dividends. DiZenzo v. Commissioner, 348 F.2d 122, 125-127 (2d Cir. 1965) (burden is on taxpayers to establish corporation did not have sufficient E&P), revg. T.C. Memo. 1964-121; Truesdell v. 47The determination of earnings and profits is governed by sec. 316 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.Page: Previous 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011